Datadory notebook

The Data Format Landscape: One Catalog, 1,061 Labels, Four Pipelines

1,744 datasets. Pick your catch. Every guide here is built on what the catalog can actually prove.

1,744 datasets. Pick your catch.

Which formats dominate the 1,744-dataset catalog?

The by_format field reads less like a spec sheet than an inventory of what organizations actually ship. Of the 1,744 datasets Datadory catalogs, 734 (42.1%) offer CSV and 675 (38.7%) offer JSON, and together those two bracket almost every integration conversation. Excel-family spreadsheets arrive as a bloc rather than a single label: 569 datasets carry one of the three plain tags — xlsx (410), xls (97) and generic excel (62) — and once compound spellings such as "xlsx (codebooks, summary tables)" or "excel (zipped bulk)" are counted, the family totals 673 label mentions.

HTML is the fourth pillar at 572 datasets (32.8%), spanning raw pages, on-page tables and interactive dashboards, and PDF documents appear on 420 (24.1%). XML adds 287 (16.5%). Below the head sits a genuinely long tail: 71 datasets offer TSV, 66 GeoJSON, 54 plain txt and 36 PNG chart images, down to singletons such as EBCDIC, WikiText, WFDB heartbeat files and PC-Axis. The ranked picture below is the one to plan against.

Why does one catalog carry 1,061 distinct format labels?

Vendors describe identical containers in incompatible vocabularies. Plain "json" sits alongside "json (api)", "json_api", "json (rest api)", "json-stat", "json-ld" and "jsonp" in the same field, and statistical packages fragment the same way: SAS, SPSS, Stata and DDI spellings account for 43 label mentions across the catalog. Any coverage number computed before normalization will be wrong.

One record shows how fast labels multiply. The openFDA FAERS Adverse Event API lists json_api and json_bulk delivery next to pdf_reference, xlsx_reference and yaml_reference — a single source, five labels, two of which mean "JSON" to a normalizer. Its 20.7 million adverse-event reports arrive as roughly 113.7 GB spread across 1,767 quarterly JSON zip partitions, so the wrapper matters as much as the payload.

The practical rule: collapse labels into a family taxonomy — tabular, tree, document, geospatial, archive — before promising coverage to stakeholders. Field definitions are verified for 1,495 of the 1,744 datasets (85.7%), but format strings stay verbatim upstream, so the normalization step belongs in your pipeline, not the vendor's.

What do 159 industry briefs say about formats on the ground?

The catalog-wide hierarchy repeats in every industry debrief. Across the 159 industry briefs, CSV is named in 117 narratives and JSON in 104, with both appearing together in 78. Water utilities calls "CSV ... the dominant format". Oil and gas exploration & production reports that "Bulk Excel/CSV dominates access (12 of 18 primary datasets ship Excel or CSV)", with LAS, DLIS and SEGY reserved for subsurface releases.

Sector texture then bends the baseline. Aerospace-defense briefs say formats "lean XLSX, CSV and PDF". Regional banks receive FFIEC data as "Excel-compatible tab-delimited and XBRL files inside ZIP archives". Construction engineering pulls Socrata JSON/CSV/GeoJSON straight from city portals: NYC DOB job-application filings run about 2.72 million rows refreshed daily, and Chicago Building Permits adds about 845,000 rows across 122 columns. Biotechnology ignores office conventions altogether — its brief spans JSON, TSV, FASTQ, BAM, VCF, MAF, SDF, mmCIF and H5AD, the vocabulary of sequencing and structural biology rather than spreadsheets.

Which four pipelines cover the whole catalog?

Four tiers cover the catalog end to end, and each has a distinct failure mode.

1. The tabular tier (roughly half the catalog). CSV, TSV and XLSX need delimiter sniffing, header-row handling and multi-sheet workbook parsing. Government microdata deepens the requirement: statistical-package labels (SAS, SPSS, Stata, DDI) total 43 mentions, concentrated in the releases electric-utilities and research-consulting-services buyers pull. Step zero is unzip-and-normalize — 237 datasets list ZIP outright, and archive and compression labels add up to roughly 382 mentions once .gz, .tar.gz and 7z variants are counted.

What this means for you

If you model or analyze: do not wait for Parquet. Only 86 sources ship it, so plan local conversion from CSV and JSON, and expect government microdata to arrive as SAS, SPSS or Stata files. The curated picks for data scientists sort sources by exactly these mechanics.

If you invest or quant-trade: banking and macro workflows are ZIP-wrapped mainframe text plus XBRL — the FFIEC pattern — so build quarterly bulk pulls with a parse layer, not live API taps.

Pick up where this leaves off

Every one of these ships with sample rows before you commit to anything.

Drug Retail Global submissions to the US FDA - United States and foreign…

openFDA FAERS Adverse Event API

Application Software United States: all commercial banks filing FFIEC Call Reports…

FFIEC CDR Bulk Data Download

Biotechnology Global submissions spanning all domains of life

NCBI GenBank

LOCUS · ACCESSION · VERSION …+5 more

Biotechnology Global - studies registered from 200+ countries, site…

ClinicalTrials.gov

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Volve field, block 15/9

Volve Open Field Dataset

Construction & Engineering City of Chicago, geocoded to property address with ward…

Chicago Building Permits

Want rows instead of a pitch? Name the datasets.

API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.

Get a sample

Questions worth asking

Which is more common in open data, CSV or JSON?

CSV, narrowly. Of the 1,744 datasets Datadory catalogs, 734 (42.1%) offer CSV and 675 (38.7%) offer JSON. Across the 159 industry briefs, CSV is named in 117 narratives versus 104 for JSON, and both appear together in 78 — so most buyers should support both rather than choose.