Datadory notebook

Hts Chapter 64 Footwear Imports Data: Dataset Structure and Field Coverage

Datadory delivers hts chapter 64 footwear imports data covering comprehensive field definitions, entity mappings, and historical time series — structured for direct analytics and delivered on demand.

1,744 datasets. Pick your catch.

Which dataset carries HTS Chapter 64 footwear imports?

The canonical source is USITC DataWeb - U.S. Footwear Import/Export and Tariff Data. It queries Chapter 64 at HTS 10-digit level — roughly 400+ active statistical lines — sliced by year or month, partner country and customs district of entry, carrying import value plus one or two quantity measures per line. History reaches back to 1989, results ship as JSON, XLSX or HTML tables, and the underlying statistics are a U.S. Government work in the commercial delivery terms.

That reuse cuts both ways for a footwear analyst. Because DataWeb is a general trade engine rather than a footwear-specific product, its Chapter 64 coverage is exactly as deep as the HTS chapter itself, and the same registration unlocks every other chapter you might benchmark against — no separate vendor relationship per commodity.

What does Chapter 64 look like inside the HTS?

That hierarchy matters practically: a 10-digit pull gives you statistical-line detail no aggregator carries — down to footwear type and material construction as the HTS distinguishes them — while the HS6 view trades depth for approximately 226-reporter bilateral coverage. Pick the rung that matches the decision: tariff exposure by exact product goes to DataWeb, market share by exporter goes to the OEC, and pairs-denominated sizing goes to APICCAPS. The table below maps who reports what.

How do you pull a full-year Chapter 64 import table?

For the state-and-port dimension DataWeb lacks, USA Trade Online (US Census Bureau) slices monthly merchandise imports by HS commodity code, country, customs district, state and port back to January 2002, exporting JSON, CSV or XLSX with no registration step.

How do US line-level figures compare with global bilateral flows?

They measure different things, and analysts use them together. USITC DataWeb gives the importer-side view at maximum line detail for one market — the United States — while the OEC's BACI cube gives exporter-importer pairs for approximately 226 reporter economies across the 25 HS6 footwear lines, with Trade Value, Quantity and Unit Value measures per flow.

A unit-price bridge closes the gap between dollars and physical volume: APICCAPS reports average unit prices alongside production, consumption and trade in pairs and USD for its 84 markets, which lets you test whether a dollar surge in a 10-digit import line reflects price or volume.

Pick up where this leaves off

Every one of these ships with sample rows before you commit to anything.

Footwear United States trade with all partner countries, with customs…

USITC DataWeb: U.S. Footwear Import, Export and Tariff Statistics

Footwear Worldwide - roughly 226 reporter economies in the 2024 file…

Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) - Footwear HS Profile

Aluminum United States as reporter

USA Trade Online (US Census Bureau)

1480000000 · 920000000 · 985000000 …+7 more

Footwear World totals plus 84 individual country and market profiles…

World Footwear Yearbook 2026 (APICCAPS)

Want rows instead of a pitch? Name the datasets.

API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.

Get a sample

Questions worth asking

Is there a free API for Chapter 64 footwear import data?

Yes. USITC DataWeb returns JSON through a free registered-account REST API whose keys expire every six months, and USA Trade Online serves monthly statistics from January 2002 as JSON, CSV or XLSX without registration. The OEC keeps latest-period data and subnational detail behind Pro and Premium tokens.