Industrial Conglomerates Data Provider: Filings, Macro, Operations and Market Maps · Head-to-head
StockAnalysis.com vs EIGA Facts & Figures - European Industrial Gases Statistics Booklet
Which industrial conglomerates data provider: filings, macro, operations and market maps data fits your job: StockAnalysis.com, or EIGA Facts & Figures - European Industrial Gases Statistics Booklet. API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.
StockAnalysis.com
EIGA Facts & Figures - European Industrial Gases Statistics Booklet
Where the fields line up
No shared field names. These two answer different questions.
| Field | StockAnalysis.com | EIGA Facts & Figures - European Industrial Gases Statistics Booklet |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Total market value of the company's shares outstanding; the size axis behind every large-versus-small cut of the universe. | not in this set |
Revenue (ttm) | Trailing twelve month revenue, always current so screening never mixes stale quarters into fresh ones. | not in this set |
Net Income | Trailing twelve month net income, the bottom line before any per-share normalization. | not in this set |
EPS | Diluted earnings per share over the trailing twelve months. | not in this set |
Shares Outstanding | Current shares outstanding of the listed share class, the denominator that reconciles market cap to price. | not in this set |
PE Ratio | Price to trailing earnings multiple, the fastest read on how the market prices each dollar of profit. | not in this set |
Forward PE | Price against forward consensus earnings, showing what growth is already embedded in today's quote. | not in this set |
Dividend | Annualized dividend per share with the yield shown alongside it. | not in this set |
Analyst Price Target | Consensus twelve month target from covering analysts with the implied upside percentage. | not in this set |
Beta (5Y) | Five year monthly beta versus the broader market. | not in this set |
Owned by Insiders (%) | Percentage of shares held by insiders. | not in this set |
Owned by Institutions (%) | Percentage of shares held by institutions, a proxy for how far a name has entered mainstream portfolios. | not in this set |
Coverage, side by side
| StockAnalysis.com | EIGA Facts & Figures - European Industrial Gases Statistics Booklet | |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic | US-listed symbols primarily across NASDAQ, NYSE, CBOE and OTC Markets; international names with delayed prices | EU27 at the core, worldwide comparisons against the USA and China, top-ten country detail reaching Canada, South Korea, Mexico, Brazil and India |
| Temporal | Financial statements typically 10+ fiscal years back; price history selectable to maximum range at daily, weekly, monthly or quarterly bars | Reference year 2025 in the current edition; growth series back to 2000, supply-mode shares across 20 years, safety series to the late 1970s |
| Granularity | One row per company per metric; one column per fiscal period in statements; one bar per interval in price history | Aggregated market-level statistics; no company- or plant-level rows anywhere |
What each contains
Pick by fit, not by loyalty.
| StockAnalysis.com | EIGA Facts & Figures - European Industrial Gases Statistics Booklet | |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | StockAnalysis.com, a market-data publisher serving quote pages across US venues | European Industrial Gases Association (EIGA), the industry's European trade association |
| Subject lens | Company-level market data: prices, fundamentals, valuation ratios, ownership and analyst targets per listed symbol | Industry-level statistics: market value, gas-by-gas splits, country rankings, supply modes and safety trends |
| Unit of analysis | One row per company per metric; one column per fiscal period in statements; one bar per interval in price history | Aggregated market-level statistics; no company- or plant-level rows anywhere |
| Documented fields | 18 columns, definitions verified during research | 7 fields, definitions verified during research |
| Geographic coverage | US-listed symbols primarily across NASDAQ, NYSE, CBOE and OTC Markets; international names with delayed prices | EU27 at the core, worldwide comparisons against the USA and China, top-ten country detail reaching Canada, South Korea, Mexico, Brazil and India |
| Temporal coverage | Financial statements typically 10+ fiscal years back; price history selectable to maximum range at daily, weekly, monthly or quarterly bars | Reference year 2025 in the current edition; growth series back to 2000, supply-mode shares across 20 years, safety series to the late 1970s |
| Signature fields | `Market Cap`, `Revenue (ttm)`, `EPS`, `PE Ratio`, `Forward PE`, `EV / EBITDA`, `Return on Equity (ROE)`, `Analyst Price Target`, `Short % of Shares Out` | `market_value_eu27`, `market_split_by_gas_pct`, `country_market_size_eubn`, `supply_mode_share`, `co2_demand_tons`, `helium_demand`, `lti_frequency_rate` |
| Headline figures | GE Aerospace: 361.85B market cap on 50.64B trailing revenue, EPS 8.49, PE 40.62, dividend yield 0.54 percent, Strong Buy from 22 analysts | EUR 96.4 Bn worldwide market in 2025; EU27 worth EUR 19.67 Bn; growth averaging 4.9 percent a year across 2015-2025 |
| Formats delivered | Structured pages and JSON history records normalized to typed rows | Annual 52-page PDF booklet whose figures are re-tabulated into typed rows |
| Best for | Screening, factor construction, comps tables, fundamentals panels, sell-side tracking | Market sizing, country benchmarking, decarbonisation baselines, competitive-intelligence denominators |
What each does better
StockAnalysis.com
Company resolution, at scale. Every one of those 130,000-plus symbols gets the identical frame, which is what makes a screener or a comps table possible: GE Aerospace printing a 361.85B market cap on 50.64B of trailing revenue, 8.49 of EPS, a 40.62 PE against a 41.06 forward multiple, a 0.54 percent dividend yield and a Strong Buy consensus from twenty-two analysts with a 404.90 target - all label-stable, all typed.
Statements deep enough to hold a cycle. The financials view typically reaches ten or more fiscal years back, laid out as annual, quarterly or trailing-twelve-month columns with exact period-end dates attached, so margin and growth trajectories survive the acquisitions and divestitures that reshuffle a conglomerate's segments. The captured sample shows FY 2025 revenue of $45,855 million converting to $8,704 million of net income, with segment detail - Equipment at $13,433 million against Services at $30,436 million - telling the aftermarket story in three numbers.
Market judgment as columns. Consensus targets, upside percentages, ratings, beta, ownership splits and short interest turn sentiment and positioning into filterable fields rather than footnotes. Nothing in the booklet touches any of this - deliberately. It counts no companies at all.
the EIGA booklet
The denominator the equity record lacks. StockAnalysis.com can tell you what the market pays for a gases-adjacent franchise; it cannot tell you how large the European gas market actually is. The booklet does: EUR 96.4 billion worldwide in 2025 measured at an average EUR:USD rate of 1.041, EU27 third behind the USA and China at EUR 19.67 billion, split oxygen 26 percent, nitrogen 22, hydrogen 15, other 12, argon 9, medical oxygen 8, carbon dioxide 6, helium 2. Share estimates need exactly this total before they mean anything.
A country ladder beyond Europe. Germany leads at EUR 4.7 billion, France 3.5, Italy 3.1, the United Kingdom 2.6 - then the ranking leaves the continent: Canada 2.2, South Korea 1.9, Mexico 1.8, Spain 1.7, Brazil 1.6, India 1.5. Ten concrete markets instead of one blurry continent.
Structural and safety context no filing prints. Supply-mode shares traced across twenty years - packaged gases largest by value throughout, onsite/pipeline, bulk and the rest barely moving - plus CO2 demand above three million tons annually with ammonia the dominant source and bioethanol growing, hydrogen production capacity that peaks then contracts, per-country plant counts, and a roughly tenfold reduction in lost-time injury frequency since the late 1970s. That is industry structure, not company performance.
Where they're equivalent
Less than most pairings, more than the subject gulf suggests:
- Verified dictionaries: eighteen fields and seven, every definition confirmed against the records themselves during Datadory's August 21, 2026 research pass rather than inferred - part of the 85.7 percent of the catalog whose definitions are verified.
- Both clear the quality bar: 8 out of 10 and 7 out of 10, against a catalog average of 7.81.
- Both are reference points their readers quote without citation hunts: sell-side notes lean on the same quote-page fields, and the industry leans on the same market totals.
- Neither carries the other's specialty: no market-total series exists in the quote-page dictionary, and no company-level figure exists in the booklet. A workflow wanting both buys both capabilities.
The verdict
Verdict: sample both, pick by fit - the unit of analysis decides, not the leaderboard.
Pick StockAnalysis.com when the subject is a company or a cohort of them. Accept its frame: quoted companies only, US depth first.
Pick the EIGA Facts & Figures booklet when the subject is the market those companies operate in. Sizing a European gas opportunity before committing a product line, benchmarking national markets against each other, anchoring decarbonisation narratives in hydrogen and CO2 series, sanity-checking player-level share estimates against stable supply-mode structure - anything answered by how big is the pond. Accept its frame: aggregates only, Europe first, figures that arrive as chart callouts until someone re-tabulates them.
Three quick tests settle most cases. Need a ticker's multiple or target? Only the equities record has it. Need the EU27 total or the country ladder? Only the booklet has it. Need to know whether a gases-exposed conglomerate's segment deserves its premium? That one takes both.
Sample both, pick by fit. See StockAnalysis.com · See EIGA Facts & Figures - European Industrial Gases Statistics Booklet
Or take both in one feed
Yes - as a market-plus-players overlay rather than a merge. The booklet supplies the terrain: how many billions each national gas market turns over, which gases take which share, how supply modes have held still for two decades. StockAnalysis.com supplies the tenants: the diversified parents, their reported statements, their quoted multiples and their analyst coverage. Together they answer the composite question neither holds alone - whether a gases-exposed franchise trades rich or cheap against the size of the market actually available to it.
Join discipline matters more here than in most pairings, because nothing shares a key. Country names bridge the booklet's rankings to wherever your company universe lives - headquarters, listing venue or reported segment geography, declared once and kept consistent. Years must align too: the booklet speaks in reference years while statements speak in fiscal periods ending on exact dates. And respect the grain gap - a EUR 4.7 billion German market is a context number beside a company row, never a cell you sum into one.
Browse the rest of the shelf at the industrial conglomerates data hub, rank the neighbors on the best industrial-conglomerates datasets list, see the market layer's sibling in the European Industrial Gases Association profile, or start from the data dictionary definition.
Datadory normalizes each record to its documented dictionary before anything ships, re-tabulating the booklet's figures into typed rows - metric, geography, gas, year, value, unit - and delivering either record alone or merged onto one calendar, daily, weekly, or hourly - your call. Or take both in one feed.
API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.
Fair questions
Is StockAnalysis.com better than the EIGA Facts & Figures booklet?
They are different instruments, not ranks - though the equities record does score higher, 8 out of 10 against 7. StockAnalysis.com answers what a listed company earns, owns and trades at, across more than 130,000 symbols with verified eighteen-field documentation. The booklet answers how big the European industrial-gas market is - EUR 19.67 billion across EU27, ranked by country. Match the record to the unit of analysis.
Do StockAnalysis.com and the EIGA booklet cover the same subjects?
No. One covers listed companies - per-ticker fundamentals, valuation multiples, ownership and analyst targets across NASDAQ, NYSE, CBOE and OTC Markets. The other covers a market - EU27 gas demand split eight ways, top-ten country sizes and supply-mode shares. Their only common ground is the industry itself, which is exactly why pairing them works.
Which dataset should back a market-sizing analysis?
The booklet, as the denominator: a EUR 96.4 billion world market, EUR 19.67 billion inside EU27, Germany leading at EUR 4.7 billion ahead of France at 3.5. Then bring in the equities record to map which listed players sit exposed to that demand and at what valuation. Market totals from one record, company resolution from the other.
Can company-level stock data be joined to the gas-market statistics?
Yes, through geography and year rather than any shared key. Attribute companies to countries using headquarters or segment geography, align fiscal periods to the booklet's reference year, and keep the grains separate - a national market total contextualizes a company row, it never sums with one. Expect a mapping table built once and audited, not a native join.
Can Datadory deliver both datasets together?
Yes - alone or merged onto one calendar, delivered daily, weekly, or hourly, your call. Each arrives normalized to its documented dictionary (eighteen fields on the equities side, seven on the statistics side) with sample rows for inspection first, and the booklet's chart-callout figures arrive re-tabulated into typed rows. Or take both in one feed.