Diversified Capital Markets Data Provider · Head-to-head
World Bank Capital Markets Indicators (WDI) vs EOD Historical Data APIs
Which diversified capital markets data provider data fits your job: World Bank Capital Markets Indicators, or EOD Historical Data APIs. API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.
World Bank Capital Markets Indicators (WDI)
EOD Historical Data APIs
Coverage, side by side
| World Bank Capital Markets Indicators | EOD Historical Data APIs | |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic | 200+ World Bank member economies plus regional and income aggregates worldwide | 150,000+ tickers across major US, European and Asian exchanges, plus crypto and FX |
| Temporal | 1975 through 2025 | US instruments to earliest availability (Ford from June 1972); most non-US exchanges from January 3, 2000 |
| Granularity | One annual observation per country per indicator - a country-year panel | Per-instrument bars at daily, intraday-interval or US tick-level resolution |
What each contains
Pick by fit, not by loyalty.
| World Bank Capital Markets Indicators | EOD Historical Data APIs | |
|---|---|---|
| Geography | 200+ World Bank member economies plus regional and income aggregates worldwide | 150,000+ tickers across major US, European and Asian exchanges, plus crypto and FX |
| Temporal reach | 1975 through 2025 | US instruments to earliest availability (Ford from June 1972); most non-US exchanges from January 3, 2000 |
| Granularity | One annual observation per country per indicator - a country-year panel | Per-instrument bars at daily, intraday-interval or US tick-level resolution |
| Scale | ~7 indicators x ~265 economy codes x up to 51 years | Equities, ETFs, funds, indices, forex and crypto across 45+ API families |
| Field dictionary | 8 documented fields, definitions verified | 7 documented fields on the price bar, definitions verified |
| Formats delivered | JSON, XML, CSV, Excel | JSON, CSV |
| Best for | Cross-country benchmarking of equity market development | Security-level price history, fundamentals and derivatives research |
Or take both in one feed
They stack into a classic top-down-meets-bottom-up workflow, joined by nothing fancier than geography and timing. Start with the World Bank panel to rank hunting grounds - which markets show turnover ratios climbing and listed-company counts expanding, versus which are shallow or shrinking. Then drop into EODHD inside the markets that pass: pull the daily bars, fundamentals and filing trails for the specific tickers that survive screening. An academic studying market development can pair country aggregates with security-level evidence for one market as a case study; a quant fund can size country allocations from capitalization-to-GDP trends while executing signal research on the underlying names.
Two practical notes from the records. Align periods before joining, because one side speaks in years and the other in sessions. And expect to map economies to exchanges yourself - neither dictionary ships the bridge, though EODHD's identifier mappings cover most of the distance. Or take both in one feed.
API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.
Fair questions
Is World Bank Capital Markets Indicators (WDI) better than EOD Historical Data APIs?
Different altitudes, so neither wins outright. The World Bank panel measures national equity markets - market capitalization, traded value, turnover, listings - annually across 200-plus economies since 1975. EODHD resolves individual securities, serving daily to tick-level bars plus fundamentals, filings and options chains for 150,000+ tickers. Pick by whether your question concerns a country or a ticker.
What do World Bank Capital Markets Indicators (WDI) and EOD Historical Data APIs have in common?
Structure rather than substance. Beyond that skeleton they diverge: one describes whole economies per year, the other single instruments per session.
Which dataset covers more geography, World Bank Capital Markets Indicators (WDI) or EOD Historical Data APIs?
The World Bank panel, decisively. It spans 200-plus member economies plus regional and income aggregates worldwide. EODHD covers 150,000+ tickers across major US, European and Asian exchanges plus crypto and FX - broad by listing standards, but a frontier market without an active listing appears in the World Bank series and nowhere in the ticker universe.
Which goes back further, World Bank Capital Markets Indicators (WDI) or EOD Historical Data APIs?
The World Bank panel runs 1975 through 2025 uniformly for every economy. EODHD reaches deepest on select US names - Ford's history starts June 1972 - while most non-US exchanges begin January 3, 2000. For consistent half-century cross-country comparisons, the panel wins; for maximum depth on one US ticker, EODHD competes.
Do World Bank Capital Markets Indicators (WDI) and EOD Historical Data APIs overlap at all?
At the conceptual edges. Substantively one is country aggregates, the other security records - complementary layers, not substitutes.
Which one should a quant team sample first?
Sample both, pick by fit. Teams researching market development, country risk or allocation screens start with the World Bank's seven CM.MKT indicators. Most desks doing both keep both in rotation, joined by a country-to-exchange map they maintain themselves.