Ensembl Genome Browser

Datadory delivers ensembl genome browser data covering vertebrate genome annotation, variation and comparative genomics from EMBL-EBI and the Wellcome Sanger Institute - roughly 60,000 human genes per release on GRCh38, each feature keyed by a stable identifier such as ENSG00000141510 (TP53). Versioned releases (116, June 2026) stay citable; delivered daily, weekly, or hourly.

What is Ensembl Genome Browser?

The reference layer under most of modern genomics. Ensembl Genome Browser is the vertebrate genome annotation and variation resource built by EMBL-EBI together with the Wellcome Sanger Institute: every gene, transcript and regulatory feature on a genome, positioned on an assembly (human GRCh38 is the flagship) and stamped with a stable identifier that outlives the release that produced it. A human release carries roughly 60,000 genes, split across protein-coding, lncRNA, miRNA and the rest of the biotype zoo.

Three things make it the join table of the field rather than just another browser. First, stable IDs: ENSG00000141510 is TP53 this release and was last release, so pipelines stop breaking when symbols get renamed. Second, provenance per feature: each record names the annotation pipeline that produced it and the version of its identifier. Third, versioned releases - release 116 is the June 2026 edition, and earlier editions stay addressable, which is what makes a results section reproducible years later.

Get a sample of this dataset and the first thing you will see is real gene records, not screenshots.

What does a sample record look like?

One flat record per feature - no envelope, no nesting to unwind. TP53, the most-requested gene in human genetics, exactly as it lands:

id                  : ENSG00000141510
display_name        : TP53
description         : tumor protein p53 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:11998]
biotype             : protein_coding
species             : homo_sapiens
assembly_name       : GRCh38
seq_region_name     : 17
start               : 7661779
end                 : 7687546
strand              : -1
canonical_transcript: ENST00000269305.9
logic_name          : ensembl_havana_gene_homo_sapiens
version             : 21

A sequence lookup on the same gene returns the region descriptor with its length:

id             : ENSG00000141510
desc           : chromosome:GRCh38:17:7661779:7687546:-1
molecule       : dna
sequence_length: 25768

Thirteen facts, one row, and every one of them load-bearing: where the gene sits (chromosome 17, 7,661,779-7,687,546, reverse strand), what kind of thing it is (protein_coding), which transcript to treat as canonical, and who annotated it (the joint Ensembl-HAVANA pipeline). Note the description string - it smuggles its own source attribution in brackets, which parsers either strip or exploit.

What fields does the dataset include?

Fourteen documented fields per gene record, verified against live records during catalog research; thirteen appear below, with full sequence payloads available alongside them. Nothing inferred, no lookup table required to parse a row.

What does coverage look like across geography, time and granularity?

Geography - none, deliberately: these are reference genomes, not survey data. Species coverage spans vertebrates with human GRCh38 at the front, and companion genome collections extend the same identifier scheme to plants, microbes, fungi and invertebrates.

Temporal - annotation arrives as numbered releases, not a moving average. Release 116 is the June 2026 edition; prior releases remain preserved and addressable, which is why "as of release 112" remains a meaningful sentence in a methods section.

Granularity - one record per feature: gene, transcript or variant, each with genomic coordinates. Whole-genome file sets per species sit above that feature level, so a delivery can be a single gene record, a chromosome arm, or everything annotated in one organism.

How is the data delivered?

API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.

Who uses this data, and for what?

  • CRISPR and target-design teams - guide design starts with exact coordinates, strand and canonical transcript; a wrong annotation version silently redesigns the experiment. Pinning to a named release removes that failure mode.
  • Variant interpretation - a variant only means something once consequence prediction runs against annotated transcripts; stable IDs carry variants from a calling pipeline to clinical and association contexts without symbol drift.
  • Cross-database joins - GWAS loci, cancer genomics portals and expression matrices all name genes differently; the ENSG identifier is the common denominator that lets them meet in one table.
  • Comparative genomics - orthology and synteny work needs the same annotation conventions across species, which is precisely what a shared identifier scheme buys.
  • Reproducibility audits - archived releases make "we re-ran the analysis on the same annotation" a checkable claim instead of a promise.

Which personas get the most value?

Data scientists and ML engineers (relevance 3 of 3) pin training corpora to versioned releases so a model's features mean the same thing six months later. Developers and data-product builders (relevance 3) wire annotation into pipelines where latency and bulk both matter, and archived releases give them a rollback path. Journalists, academics and students (relevance 3) cite the canonical EMBL-EBI/Sanger annotation with the release number attached, which is the difference between a citable figure and a screenshot.

Persona packs that lead with trials, patents and market sizing - investors and quants, market researchers, competitive-intel teams - lean on other biotechnology records; this one is infrastructure for anyone whose product touches a genome. See the best biotechnology datasets ranking for where it sits among its peers.

What should I know before requesting a sample?

Three quirks worth knowing upfront. First, coordinates are one-based and fully inclusive - position 1 is the first base - so overlap math ported from half-open zero-based tooling needs an off-by-one review before it ships. Second, the description field embeds its attribution in square brackets ("tumor protein p53 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:11998]"), a convention that is machine-parseable but trips naive display code. Third, biotype values form an open-ended enum: protein_coding dominates human annotation, but lncRNA, miRNA and artifact classes appear in every release, so treat biotype filters as a whitelist you maintain rather than a closed set you inherit.

Field dictionary

Every field below is documented against real records. The full dictionary ships with the sample.

Field dictionary - thirteen documented fields on every gene record
fieldtypedefinitionexample
idstringEnsembl stable identifier for a gene, transcript, or protein.ENSG00000141510
display_namestringHuman-readable display symbol.TP53
descriptionstringGene description with source attribution in square brackets.tumor protein p53 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:11998]
biotypeenumFeature biotype such as protein_coding, lncRNA, miRNA.protein_coding
speciesstringSpecies the record belongs to.homo_sapiens
assembly_namestringGenome assembly identifier.GRCh38
seq_region_namestringChromosome or scaffold name.17
startintegerOne-based start coordinate of the feature.7661779
endintegerOne-based end coordinate of the feature.7687546
strandintegerStrand: 1 forward, -1 reverse.-1
canonical_transcriptstringStable identifier of the canonical transcript for the gene.ENST00000269305.9
logic_namestringAnnotation pipeline that produced the feature.ensembl_havana_gene_homo_sapiens
versionintegerStable identifier version number.21

Questions buyers ask

How far back does the data go?

Annotation ships as numbered releases rather than a rolling blob: release 116 is the June 2026 edition, and earlier editions are preserved, so a pipeline or paper pinned to last year's numbering can still read exactly the annotation it was built against.

Which organisms does it cover?

Vertebrates, with the human GRCh38 assembly as the flagship and mouse, zebrafish and the rest of the research menagerie behind it. Companion genome collections extend the same treatment to plants, microbes, fungi and invertebrates, so comparative work rarely leaves the identifier scheme.

Why do stable identifiers matter?

Because coordinates move and symbols mutate. An ENSG gene ID or ENST transcript ID survives annotation edits and release bumps, which makes it the cleanest join key between genome annotation and variant catalogs, cancer portals or expression matrices that each name genes their own way.

Are the coordinates one-based or zero-based?

One-based, fully inclusive: position 1 is the first base of a chromosome, and start and end both fall inside the feature. Teams converting from half-open zero-based interval formats should budget for the classic off-by-one review before any overlap arithmetic ships.

How large is a delivery?

It scales to the question. The human gene set runs about 60,000 genes per release; a single species bundle of sequences and annotations lands in the megabyte-to-gigabyte range; the full multi-species tree for one release reaches hundreds of gigabytes.

See the rows before you pay anything.

Name this dataset and we send real records from it — scoped to the fields you asked for.

See pricing