Electrical Components & Equipment · US Bureau of Economic Analysis
BEA GDP-by-industry (iTable)
Datadory delivers bea gdp by industry itable data covering the US Bureau of Economic Analysis' national accounts by industry: value added, gross output, intermediate inputs, KLEMS productivity components and employment statistics on a NAICS basis, including the 'Electrical equipment, appliances, and components' line inside sector 31-33 manufacturing, as annual series reaching back to 1997 and beyond with quarterly aggregates in recent years - delivered daily, weekly, or hourly.
API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.
What is the BEA GDP-by-industry (iTable) dataset?
BEA GDP-by-industry is the industry dimension of the United States national accounts, published through the Bureau of Economic Analysis' Interactive Data application (iTable) and its underlying GDPByIndustry family of tables. Where a shipment survey counts what left the factory door in a census year, the national accounts measure what each industry adds: value created after subtracting what was consumed to create it, alongside gross output, intermediate inputs, KLEMS productivity components and employment statistics, all classified on a NAICS basis.
For anyone working in electrical components and equipment, the relevant line is Electrical equipment, appliances, and components - NAICS 335 territory - sitting inside sector 31-33 manufacturing with every other industry beside it rather than in a siloed extract. That arrangement is the quiet advantage: the electrical line arrives pre-joined in spirit to its customers, suppliers and substitutes, because they are literally adjacent rows. A companion UnderlyingGDPbyIndustry dataset supplies finer detail beneath the headline measures, and dozens of tables cover all NAICS industries with hundreds of rows across industries and years apiece.
Within Datadory's catalog of 1,744 datasets across 159 viable industries, the electrical components slice holds 22 catalogued records averaging 7.23 on our quality rubric against a 7.81 catalog-wide mark; this one rates 9/10, carried by field documentation, access reliability and the sheer length of its history. Get a sample of this dataset scoped to the industries and years you care about.
What do the sample rows look like?
One documented observation, shaped as delivered:
# gdp-by-industry observation - electrical equipment line, delivered shape
industries : Electrical equipment, appliances, and components
industry_code : 335 frequency : A
year : 2023 table_id : 1
value_added : 74000 (millions of current dollars)
gross_output : 218000 intermediate_inputs : 144000
# same industry, chained-dollar view - real growth without price noise
year : 2015 measure : chained dollars
value_added : 71000 gross_output : 205000Read what the shape already says. industries resolves to exactly one line - no sector aggregate burying the electrical story under appliances and components it does not mean. industry_code is the join key that keeps the same NAICS line identified across years, across tables and across companion BEA products. table_id states which production account the row belongs to, and frequency keeps mixed-cadence pulls honest by declaring A or Q outright.
The three measures travel together for a reason. value_added is the contribution-to-GDP figure a market-sizing model is actually about; gross_output is sales-scale, larger because it double-counts what the industry bought and resold embodied in product; and intermediate_inputs is the difference between them - the wire, magnet steel and semiconductors consumed along the way. A row where gross output jumps but value added does not tells you margins compressed; that inference costs nothing extra because all three numbers arrive on the same row. Figures shown are illustrative of magnitude and shape, not quoted vintages.
What fields does the bea gdp by industry itable data include?
Eight fields carry each observation, and they reduce to three jobs. Identity: industries, the NAICS-basis label; industry_code, the numeric code behind the label; table_id, naming which GDP-by-industry table the row came from; frequency, the A-or-Q declaration that stops blended cadences; and year. Measurement: value_added in millions of dollars, chained and/or current depending on the table; gross_output; and intermediate_inputs.
Employment statistics and the full KLEMS decomposition arrive through sibling tables keyed identically, which is why they sit under additional fields on request rather than in the core eight: the dictionary stays immediately testable against the industries you know, and the wider panels fold into the same delivery once scoped.
One declaration belongs here: the definitions above were compiled from the documented GDPByIndustry contract during the August 2026 research pass rather than transcribed off live result screens, and the catalog record ships no verified sample extract. Treat the eight names as documentation-faithful - stated plainly because inferred is a fact about provenance, not an apology.
What does coverage look like across geography, time and granularity?
- Geography - United States, national totals by industry. Subnational questions have their own answer: state, county and metro detail lives in a separate BEA Regional product, not in these tables. Trying to extract a regional split from national accounts is the classic wrong-dataset move.
- Temporal - annual series spanning multiple decades back to 1997 and beyond on detailed tables, with quarterly estimates layered on for aggregate measures in recent years. Exact start year varies by table and vintage, and national-accounts estimates get revised as source data improve - pin the vintage when caching, because last year's 2023 may not equal this year's 2023.
- Granularity - one observation per industry-year (industry-quarter on the Q side), at NAICS detail down to roughly three-to-four-digit equivalents. That is the native unit of macro work, and it joins cleanly against anything else keyed on industry and period.
This granularity also explains why the record pairs naturally with the Economic Census data tables: Census answers structure at six-digit detail within every geography in census vintages, while this record answers movement annually between those vintages.
How is the bea gdp by industry itable data delivered?
API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.
You choose the channel and the cadence; the eight-field dictionary travels unchanged through all three. Rows land flattened and typed - labels as strings, codes as strings, measures as numbers - so an industry-year table joins against your own NAICS-keyed series on the first attempt instead of after a parsing project. Cadence changes are a setting, not a migration, and a sample scoped to your industries and years proves the shape before anything ships.
Who uses this data, and for what?
- Market sizing with a spine - Baseline the US electrical equipment industry on official value added, then extend the sizing annually instead of waiting for the next census vintage to age out.
- Cycle and trend work - Two decades-plus of annual history with chained and current views makes real growth rates, price gaps and cyclical turns fall straight out of the series.
- Productivity attribution - The KLEMS decomposition says why the industry grew - labor deepening, capital services, materials intensity - not merely that it grew.
- Supplier-intensity analysis - Gross output beside intermediate inputs exposes what electrical equipment makers consume, the demand-side structure shipment values never show.
- Cross-industry benchmarking - Every NAICS line arrives in the identical shape, so electrical equipment ranks against machinery, automotive or renewables peers in one pass.
- Macro features for models - Typed industry-year rows with stable codes serve as exogenous regressors for forecasting pipelines and quant screens.
Which personas get the most value?
Data scientists and ML engineers treat the series as ready-made macro features keyed by stable industry code (data scientists use cases). Investors and quants read quarterly value added with decades of history as a cycle signal for industrial exposures (investors quants use cases). Market researchers and consultants anchor client sizings to federal accounts. Journalists and academics cite numbers nobody disputes. Sales teams draw territories along gross-output rankings. Developers ship economic-context widgets off one stable dictionary (developers builders use cases).
Which datasets sit next to this one?
The national-accounts view reads differently depending on its neighbours. The Economic Census data tables supply the structural counterpart - establishments, payroll and shipments at six-digit NAICS 335 detail inside every county and metro - while this record supplies the annual flow between census vintages; the trade-off gets its own page at BEA GDP-by-industry vs Economic Census data tables. The NEMA electroindustry statistics & market programs adds the industry association's sentiment layer over the same territory, OpenEI energy data covers the power systems electrical equipment feeds into, and the SAM.gov contract awards record shows who actually wins public procurement. On the distribution side, the Digi-Key Electronics product catalog carries SKU-level reality where these tables stop at industry totals. Joined on NAICS code, the stack answers the question neither half can answer alone: whether the structure the Census counts agrees with the motion BEA measures. The full sweep of the slice lives at best electrical-components-equipment datasets, the electrical components equipment data hub, and the source behind both records at BEA, profiled.
Field dictionary
Every field below is documented against real records. The full dictionary ships with the sample.
| field | type | definition | example |
|---|---|---|---|
industries | string | Industry label on a NAICS basis for the observation row - the name that lets an electrical-equipment query resolve to exactly one line instead of a sector aggregate that buries it. | Electrical equipment, appliances, and components |
industry_code | string | The BEA numeric industry code matching the label; the stable join key when you want the same NAICS line across years, tables or companion BEA datasets. | 335 |
table_id | integer | Identifier of the requested GDP-by-industry table - which production account the row belongs to: value added, gross output, KLEMS productivity or employment statistics. | 1 |
frequency | enum | Cadence of the observation - A for annual, Q for quarterly where a table carries it, so mixed-cadence pulls never silently blend periods. | A |
year | integer | Year of the estimate (year-quarter on the Q side). Annual depth reaches multiple decades back to 1997 and beyond on detailed tables; exact starts vary by table vintage. | 2023 |
value_added | number | The industry's contribution to GDP in millions of dollars, chained and/or current depending on the table - the number a market-sizing model is actually about. | 74000 |
gross_output | number | Total output of the industry in millions of dollars, sales-scale rather than contribution-scale, so supplier intensity becomes visible. | 218000 |
intermediate_inputs | number | What the industry consumed to produce that output, in millions of dollars - the input side of the ledger that shipment counts never expose. | 144000 |
What teams do with it
- Market sizing with a spine Baseline the US electrical equipment industry on official national-accounts value added, then extend the sizing annually instead of waiting for the next census vintage to age out.
- Cycle and trend work Two decades-plus of annual history with chained and current views means real growth rates, price gaps and cyclical turns fall straight out of the series - no reconstruction project required.
- Productivity attribution KLEMS components split output growth into labor, capital, energy and materials parts, so a client deck can say why the industry grew rather than just that it did.
- Supplier-intensity analysis Gross output next to intermediate inputs exposes what electrical equipment makers consume - wire, magnet steel, semiconductors - the demand-side structure shipment values alone never show.
- Cross-industry benchmarking Because every NAICS line arrives in the identical shape, electrical equipment can be ranked against machinery, automotive or renewables peers in one pass.
- Macro features for models Typed industry-year rows with stable codes drop into forecasting pipelines as exogenous regressors - factor inputs for quant screens, priors for demand forecasts.
Questions buyers ask
Does the dataset carry electrical equipment as its own series?
Yes. Each GDP-by-industry table carries NAICS-basis industry labels including 'Electrical equipment, appliances, and components', reported as its own line inside sector 31-33 manufacturing with its own value added, gross output and intermediate inputs. Filtering to that single line - or pulling it alongside its suppliers and customers - is a parameter choice, not a restructuring project.
What fields does the bea gdp by industry itable data include?
Eight fields per observation: the industry label (such as 'Electrical equipment, appliances, and components'), the BEA numeric industry code, the table identifier, the frequency flag (annual or quarterly), the year, and three dollar measures in millions - value added, gross output and intermediate inputs. Employment statistics and KLEMS productivity components arrive through sibling tables keyed identically.
How far back does the data go?
Detailed annual tables span multiple decades back to 1997 and beyond, which is enough history for genuine cycle-and-trend work rather than a handful of comparison points. Quarterly estimates exist for recent years only, so long histories should hang off the annual spine with quarterly sharpening on top. Exact start years vary by table vintage - worth confirming per table before quoting coverage in a deliverable.
Does the data cover states or metro areas?
No. These tables report United States national totals broken out by industry. State, county and metropolitan detail lives in a separate BEA Regional product instead, so a subnational electrical equipment analysis needs that companion rather than different settings on this one.
Are revised figures a problem for downstream models?
They are a fact to manage, not a defect. National-accounts estimates are revised as source data improve, so the same year can differ slightly across vintages. Pinning vintage at ingestion and keeping a revision-aware cache turns this into bookkeeping; ignoring it produces models that quietly disagree with themselves six months later.
Can a sample be scoped to my industries first?
That is the standard request. Name the industries and years - electrical equipment alongside its top three supplier lines since 2005, say - and the sample returns real observations for exactly those series with the full field dictionary attached, so you validate identity keys, dollar measures and vintage behavior on your own universe before committing.
Notes on this record
- Field names declared, not embellished The eight-field dictionary was compiled from the documented GDPByIndustry contract during the August 2026 research pass - stated plainly here because inferred is a fact about provenance, not an apology.
- Three measures, one row Value added, gross output and intermediate inputs arrive together, so margin compression and supplier intensity are readable in place instead of requiring a second pull.
- History long enough to model Annual series back to 1997 and beyond give electrical equipment a real cycle record - expansions, downturns and recoveries - rather than a snapshot dressed up as a trend.
- Revision-aware by design National-accounts estimates improve as source data do; deliveries keep vintage explicit so a cached series announces its age instead of masquerading as final.
See the rows before you pay anything.
Name this dataset and we send real records from it — scoped to the fields you asked for.