Diversified Chemicals Data Provider · Head-to-head
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Basic Data Files vs USGS National Minerals Information Center (Mineral Commodity Statistics)
Which diversified chemicals data provider data fits your job: EPA Toxics Release Inventory Basic Data Files, or USGS National Minerals Information Center. API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Basic Data Files
USGS National Minerals Information Center (Mineral Commodity Statistics)
Where the fields line up
No shared field names. These two answer different questions.
| Field | EPA Toxics Release Inventory Basic Data Files | USGS National Minerals Information Center |
|---|---|---|
YEAR | Reporting year of the submission - the time axis of every panel built from these files. | not in this set |
TRIFD | TRI Facility Identification number, the join spine linking one facility's rows across chemicals, years and companion EPA program data. | not in this set |
FRS ID | EPA Facility Registry Service identifier, cross-walking the reporting site across EPA program systems. | not in this set |
FACILITY NAME | Name of the reporting facility as submitted. | not in this set |
CITY / COUNTY / ST / ZIP | Facility location block: city, county, state-or-territory abbreviation and postal code. | not in this set |
LATITUDE / LONGITUDE | Facility coordinates, so every record maps without a separate geocoding pass. | not in this set |
PARENT CO NAME | Parent company name as reported, the axis that rolls facility-level disclosures up to corporate portfolios and supply bases. | not in this set |
PRIMARY SIC / PRIMARY NAICS | Facility's primary Standard Industrial Classification and North American Industry Classification System codes; chemical manufacturing reports under NAICS 325. | not in this set |
INDUSTRY SECTOR CODE / INDUSTRY SECTOR | Two-digit TRI industry sector code and its descriptive name, the program's own sectoring of reporters. | not in this set |
CHEMICAL / CAS# | Name of the reported TRI chemical and its Chemical Abstracts Service registry number, pinning substance identity for joins. | not in this set |
CLASSIFICATION / METAL | Chemical classification category and whether the substance is a metal or metal-category compound. | not in this set |
CARCINOGEN | Indicator of whether the chemical is recognized or suspected as a carcinogen. | not in this set |
Coverage, side by side
| EPA Toxics Release Inventory Basic Data Files | USGS National Minerals Information Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic | United States: all states, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and other territories, plus separate national, federal-facility and tribal-land files | United States with state and county detail in Minerals Yearbook tables, plus world mine production and reserves by country |
| Temporal | Reporting years 1987 through 2024, one file per year and geography; latest processed versions as of November 5, 2025 | Five data years per Mineral Commodity Summaries edition (February 2026 edition covers estimate year 2025); Yearbook chapters run longer series, 2022-2023 newest during research |
| Granularity | Per facility, per chemical, per year | Commodity x year x measure, down to state/county and company-level tables in Yearbook workbooks |
What each contains
They tie on 1 attribute. Pick by fit, not by loyalty.
| EPA Toxics Release Inventory Basic Data Files | USGS National Minerals Information Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Geography | United States: all states, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and other territories, plus separate national, federal-facility and tribal-land files | United States with state and county detail in Minerals Yearbook tables, plus world mine production and reserves by country |
| Temporal reach | Reporting years 1987 through 2024, one file per year and geography; latest processed versions as of November 5, 2025 | Five data years per Mineral Commodity Summaries edition (February 2026 edition covers estimate year 2025); Yearbook chapters run longer series, 2022-2023 newest during research |
| Granularity | Per facility, per chemical, per year | Commodity x year x measure, down to state/county and company-level tables in Yearbook workbooks |
| Scale | Roughly 90k+ records per recent national reporting year; hundreds of MB to several GB across 38 annual files | About 90 two-page commodity chapters per Summaries edition (roughly 190 files per year directory) plus three Yearbook volumes of PDF and XLSX chapter pairs |
| Field dictionary | 53 documented fields, definitions verified | 10 documented fields, definitions verified |
| File shape | One CSV file per reporting year and geography | Two-page commodity chapter PDFs; Yearbook chapters as PDF plus XLSX pairs |
| Named companies | Yes - PARENT CO NAME per submission (WASTE MANAGEMENT INC) | No - countries, states and end-use shares only |
| Best for | Facility-level toxics exposure, compliance and waste-management analysis | Feedstock economics: prices, trade dependence, end-use demand and reserve adequacy |
Or take both in one feed
An ESG analyst can normalize TRI release totals against USGS production figures to express toxicity intensity per ton of output instead of per filing. A market-entry researcher can pair end-use shares (glass 45 percent, chemicals 28 percent for soda ash) with TRI's facility map to locate where downstream demand and upstream reporting actually sit.
Two practical notes from the records. Align geography first - facility latitude-longitude versus state, county and country aggregates - and mind the period grids: reporting-year submissions on one side, five-year salient blocks plus longer Yearbook series on the other. Expect no shared identifier between a TRIFD and a commodity chapter; the bridge is yours to build. Or take both in one feed.
API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.
Fair questions
Is EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Basic Data Files better than USGS mineral commodity statistics?
Better for different questions. TRI wins when you need named facilities - geocoded plants with parent companies, chemical identities by CAS number, hazard flags and pathway-split release and waste quantities across reporting years 1987 through 2024.
Do the TRI basic files and USGS mineral commodity statistics cover the same chemicals?
They meet on metals and inorganic materials, then diverge. TRI reports toxic substances facility by facility, tagging each with a CAS registry number, a METAL flag and carcinogen, PBT and PFAS designations.
How far back do each of these records go?
TRI reaches furthest on a single consistent spine: one file per reporting year from 1987 through 2024, reflecting forms processed as of November 5, 2025. The USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries carry five data years per edition, with earlier editions archived; the Minerals Yearbook runs longer multi-year series, with 2022-2023 the newest volumes during research.
How current are the EPA TRI and USGS mineral commodity records?
Both hold fresh vintages. TRI files reflect submissions processed as of November 5, 2025 for reporting years through 2024. The USGS edition posted February 2026 covers estimate year 2025 and has been revised to version 1.2 by April 2026, with a revision log maintained. Once sampled, either can be delivered daily, weekly, or hourly - your call.
Can I get both EPA TRI and USGS mineral commodity statistics from Datadory?
Yes - sample both, pick by fit, or take both in one feed. Datadory normalizes each record to its documented field dictionary, attaches sample rows for validation, and ships them on the delivery schedule your workflow needs, next to the rest of the diversified chemicals catalog.