SHRM HR Benchmarks

Datadory delivers shrm hr benchmarks data covering the four annual benchmarking modules of the Society for Human Resource Management - HR Function Strategy & Management, Learning & Development, Recruiting and Talent Management - plus the Employee Benefits Survey, State of the Workplace report and quarterly Civility Index: HR-to-employee ratios, cost per hire, time to fill, turnover and retention rates, benefits incidence and workplace trend measures, rolled into percentile distributions by industry segment and organization size band, packaged as joinable rows.

What are SHRM HR Benchmarks?

SHRM - the Society for Human Resource Management - is the world's largest HR professional society, and its benchmarking program is the profession measuring itself. The core product, marketed as "How Does Your Organization Measure Up?" (current edition dated October 15, 2025), spans four topic areas: HR Function Strategy & Management, Learning & Development, Recruiting and Talent Management. Each module collects organization-level metrics from participating employers and returns percentile comparisons by industry and organization size - so the answer to "how does our HR function stack up?" is a distribution position, not a single average.

Around that core sit recurring research lines: the annual Employee Benefits Survey (a 2026 edition is listed), the State of the Workplace summary and report (2026), Talent Trends, the quarterly Civility Index pulse survey, and special studies such as Automation, AI, and Job Displacement Risk in U.S. Employment. Datadory turns this program into one structured dataset for the human resource and employment services industry, reshaped into rows that join against payroll, openings and wage data. Get a sample of this dataset and put your own cost-per-hire against the peer distribution.

What do sample rows from the dataset look like?

One row per metric per peer cut per benchmark cycle - organization-level practice measures rendered as distribution statistics. These rows illustrate the shape, using the metric families the benchmarking program has long covered:

topic_area              metric                peer_cut                     value      period  
HR Function             hr_to_employee_ratio  500-2499 employees           1.2 per100 2025    
Recruiting              cost_per_hire_usd     professional services        4700       2025    
Recruiting              time_to_fill_days     all industries               44         2025    
Talent Mgmt             voluntary_turnover    health care                  18.5 pct   2025    
Talent Mgmt             retention_rate        manufacturing                88 pct     2025    
Employee Benefits       benefit_offered_pct   parental leave               45 pct     2026    
Workplace Trends        civility_index        quarterly pulse reading      index+WoW  Q2 2026

Values above are illustrative of row shape; the percentile spread behind each metric arrives with the sample, so the distribution you test is the distribution you build on. Percentile cuts mean every metric carries more than a median - the p25/p75 shoulders are where "are we normal or are we outlier" questions actually get answered.

What fields does the dataset include?

Eight fields carry each record, defined in the dictionary below. The pair worth reading closely is industry segment + organization size band: they are what turn a raw benchmark number into a peer comparison, because SHRM's methodology returns percentiles within those cuts rather than one blended national figure.

Additional fields on request. Each of the four modules runs deeper than its headline metrics - sub-metrics on HR budget allocation, L&D hours and spend per employee, sourcing-channel mix and time-to-productivity sit inside the published reports, and field definitions carry inferred confidence until pinned down against your sample. The dictionary you buy is the dictionary you tested.

Where does coverage reach?

  • Geo: Primarily United States, with some global editions of SHRM research including India and MENA regional work alongside the U.S. core.
  • Temporal: Annual benchmarking cycles - the current edition, "How Does Your Organization Measure Up?", carries an October 15, 2025 date - with the Employee Benefits Survey and State of the Workplace on yearly rhythm and only the Civility Index breaking pattern at quarterly cadence.
  • Granularity: Organization-level metrics rolled into percentile distributions by industry segment and organization size band.

The participant counts behind each cycle are not disclosed on open pages, which is exactly why the percentile frame matters: it preserves anonymity for reporting organizations while still giving comparators a place to stand.

How is the data delivered?

API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.

Pick the modules, pick the cadence, pick the landing zone - the same rows arrive whichever way you take them. The sample comes first, so the metric mix and the peer cuts are settled facts before any commitment.

Who builds on it?

  • Sales & growth teams pitch HR leaders using the recruiting, turnover and L&D benchmarks those leaders are themselves measured against - account context lives on the sales growth teams use cases page.
  • Market researchers and consultants benchmark HR function staffing and spend percentiles by client industry and size in org-design studies; the market researchers use cases page shows where the modules slot into a broader HR panel.
  • Investors and quant researchers read benefits incidence and turnover trends as wage-pressure signals for portfolio sectors, checked against BLS separations; the investors quants use cases page covers the workflow.
  • Competitive intelligence and product teams compare which benefits employers actually offer when positioning an HR-tech roadmap; the competitive intel product teams use cases page maps the play.
  • Journalists and academics cite State of the Workplace and Civility Index findings in coverage of workplace norms, with the citation patterns on the journalists academics use cases page.

Teams wiring the feed into internal dashboards will find delivery-side detail in the developers builders use cases page.

Which datasets and notes pair with it?

  • BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) - pay percentiles by occupation and area; pair it to put SHRM's HR-practice benchmarks next to auditable wage distributions for the same cuts.
  • BLS JOLTS - hires, openings and separations back to December 2000; the churn-side counterpart to SHRM's turnover and retention measures.
  • ASA Staffing Industry Research - the staffing-firm side of the same labor market, with a weekly index and occupational mix; pair it when the question spans both the buyer and supplier of contingent talent.
  • PayScale research - individual-level compensation survey data, a bottom-up check on any pay-adjacent benchmark.
  • **O*NET Database (downloadable)** - occupation-level task and work-context ratings under standard catalog terms 4.0, the open complement for role definitions behind each benchmarked job family.

Two glossary notes sharpen the vocabulary before you commit: how turnover is separated into voluntary and involuntary components in workforce data, and what salary benchmarks cover versus practice benchmarks like these.

Questions buyers ask

What are the four SHRM benchmarking modules?

HR Function Strategy & Management (staffing ratios, budget and spend per employee), Learning & Development (training hours and investment per employee), Recruiting (cost per hire, time to fill, vacancy and source-of-hire measures) and Talent Management (voluntary and involuntary turnover plus retention rates). Each module collects organization-level metrics and returns percentile comparisons by industry segment and organization size band.

How granular are SHRM HR benchmarks?

Metrics aggregate at organization level into percentile distributions by industry segment and organization size band, so a mid-market manufacturer reads itself against mid-market manufacturers rather than a blended national average. Participant counts for recent cycles are not disclosed on open pages, which is the trade-off for respondents' anonymity inside the percentile frame.

Does SHRM publish an employee benefits survey?

Yes. The SHRM Employee Benefits Survey is an annual research product alongside the benchmarking modules, with a 2026 edition listed in SHRM's Research & Insights hub. It complements the State of the Workplace report (also 2026) and the Talent Trends series, extending the picture from practice benchmarks to what employers actually offer.

How often does SHRM refresh its benchmarks?

The benchmarking program runs on an annual cycle; the current edition, "How Does Your Organization Measure Up?", carries an October 15, 2025 date. Employee Benefits Survey and State of the Workplace refresh annually too, while the Civility Index pulse survey updates quarterly. Between annual editions, treat any single benchmark figure as up to twelve months old.

Can I cite SHRM benchmark figures in published work?

Citing published findings with attribution is standard practice for journalists and academics, and State of the Workplace headlines appear regularly in workplace coverage. Republishing report tables or content wholesale is different from citing findings - treat republication as a question to settle with the publisher before shipping, and attribute each figure to SHRM as the producing organization.

How do SHRM benchmarks differ from BLS labor statistics?

BLS counts wages, openings and separations from employers and households through statistical programs; SHRM benchmarks HR-department practice - staffing ratios, recruiting efficiency, training investment, benefits offerings - collected directly from organizations. The two answer different questions: BLS tells you what the labor market pays and turns over, SHRM tells you how HR functions run relative to peers. Used together, practice benchmarks explain the management side of numbers BLS measures.

See the rows before you pay anything.

Name this dataset and we send real records from it — scoped to the fields you asked for.

See pricing