Precious Metals & Minerals · U.S. Geological Survey (Mineral Resources Online Spatial Data)
USGS Mineral Resources Data System (MRDS): Every Known Mineral Site as a Row
Datadory delivers usgs mineral resources data system mrds deposit records data covering 304,632 mineral sites worldwide - mines, prospects, occurrences and plants - each row carrying WGS84 coordinates, tiered commodity lists, operation type, development status from Occurrence to Producer, discovery and production years, ore minerals and an A-to-E record grade; about 69,940 records list gold.
API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.
- Where it covers
- Worldwide point coverage - most complete within the United States, thinner abroad; roughly 19% of rows lack country or state values, and Alaska's fine detail is maintained separately in the Alaska Resource Data File
- How far back
- A research snapshot: extraction dated 15 March 2016, file regenerated August 2022, with systematic updates having ceased in 2011 - operating status and production reflect each record's underlying report date, and open bounds ride < and > modifiers on first and last production years
- How fine
- One row per mineral site, prospect, occurrence or plant across 304,632 features, keyed on a 12-digit dep_id that ties together every record for a property
What is the USGS Mineral Resources Data System (MRDS) dataset?
One federal inventory, two merged lineages, one row per site. MRDS combines the original Mineral Resources Data System with the US Bureau of Mines' MAS/MILS archive into a worldwide point database of metallic and nonmetallic mineral resources - 304,632 site records spanning mines, prospects, occurrences and plants, deepest inside the United States.
What makes it usable at scale is discipline rather than size. Every site resolves against 46 flattened fields: a 12-digit dep_id tying all records for a property together, preferred and previous names, WGS84 coordinates, administrative geography down to county and district, a metallic/nonmetallic flag, commodities in three tiers with hyphenated qualifiers, operation type from placer to leach to processing plant, development status, ore and gangue minerals, deposit model names such as {Climax Mo}, host-rock codes drawn from the LithClass 6.2 lithology scheme, discovery and production years, and the bibliographic references underneath. USGS then graded each record A through E on information richness so users could find the detailed reports first.
Scale, concretely: counting the primary commodity field alone, about 69,940 records list Gold and 24,443 Silver, alongside 1,002 Platinum and 180 Palladium. Within Datadory's catalog of 1,744 datasets across 159 viable industries, this record scores 9/10 for quality, with field definitions verified.
Get a sample of this dataset
What do the sample rows look like?
Three real records chosen to span the grade range, flat exactly as their core fields arrive:
dep_id : 10028178 site_name : E. A. Culver
coords : 38.31935, -120.72045 (California, United States)
commod1 : Gold oper_type : Unknown
dev_stat : Occurrence score : D
dep_id : 10056347 site_name : Big Bell Mine
geography : Western Australia, Australia (no coordinates in this record)
commod1 : Gold,Silver dev_stat : Producer
prod_yrs : 1916-1923, 1937-1955, 1989- score : A
dep_id : 10012410 site_name : Henderson Mine
coords : 39.76916, -105.84199 (Colorado)
disc_yr : 1965 yr_fst_prd : 1976 oper_type : Underground
commod1 : Molybdenum,Lead,Tungsten,Tin,Zinc,Iron dev_stat : Producer
model : {Climax Mo} score : AFour buyer questions settle themselves here. First, shape: one flat row per site, keyed on dep_id, so a filtered pull lands in a dataframe without a parsing pass. Second, tiers: commodities split into primary, secondary and tertiary lists - Big Bell's Gold,Silver reads as a gold operation with silver credit, which is exactly the distinction commodity screens need. Third, time: production spans arrive as interval text like 1916-1923, 1937-1955, 1989-, gaps included, because districts reopen. Fourth, trust: the E. A. Culver occurrence carries a D grade and Henderson an A, so weighting records by documentation richness is a filter, not a judgment call.
Every other record repeats the same shape - the table simply fills in different sites, statuses and commodity mixes.
What fields does the dataset include?
46 flattened fields in the full digest, definitions verified during research - twenty-one form the working core in the dictionary below, grouped into five families: identification (dep_id, site name), geography (latitude, longitude, country, state), commodities (com_type, the commod1-3 tiered lists), operation and status (oper_type, dev_stat), and description (ore, gangue, host-rock code, deposit model, discovery and production years, references) plus USGS's own quality grade (score).
The remaining twenty-five are the deep-geology apparatus - deposit type, orebody form, workings type, alteration, concentration processes, ore controls, associated rock units, structure and tectonic setting among them. They ship under additional fields on request rather than cluttering the default cut, mapped to your use case at sampling.
One convention deserves a flag before any join: multi-value fields are comma-delimited within a field, and qualifiers follow each commodity after a hyphen, so Gold-refinery and bare Gold mean different metal-accounting bases. Parse against the commodity-codes list rather than assuming a flat string match.
Which fields arrive only on request?
Six groups sit beyond the core dictionary and get mapped to your use case at sampling:
- Deposit geology block - deposit type, orebody form, workings type, alteration, concentration processes and ore controls, the descriptors that explain how a site formed and was worked.
- Host and wall rock detail - host rock and associated rock units with their LithClass 6.2 codes, plus structure and tectonic setting where reported.
- Commodity qualifier strings - the hyphenated suffixes distinguishing refinery product from contained-metal figures, decoded against the controlled commodity-codes list.
- Administrative geography - region, county, district and land status extending the country-and-state pair shown in the samples.
- Workings history text - free-text production-history notes, discoverer attribution and previous site names preserved beside the current preferred form.
- Legacy identifiers - mrds_id and mas_id keys for reconciling against older Bureau of Mines extracts still sitting in internal systems.
Name the ones you want when you request the sample; they arrive as ordinary columns in the same rows, not as a side file.
What does coverage look like across geography, time and granularity?
Geography - worldwide point coverage with the United States carrying the deepest detail; roughly 19% of rows lack country or state values, so coordinate-based filters outperform name-based ones. Alaska's fine-grained detail lives in its companion Alaska Resource Data File rather than here.
Temporal - treat the table as a research snapshot: extraction dated 15 March 2016, file regenerated August 2022, and USGS systematic updates having ceased in 2011. Human-activity fields - operating status, ownership, production - reflect only the date of each record's underlying source report, which is why a row can say Producer while the site sits idle. Open-ended bounds carry < and > modifiers on first and last production years, so "began after 1905" stays distinguishable from "began in 1905".
Granularity - one row per mineral site, prospect, occurrence or plant across 304,632 features, keyed on the 12-digit dep_id. There is no annual time series hiding inside; year fields describe a site's life, they do not build a production panel. Pair with a statistics series when the question is tonnage over time rather than where sites sit.
How is the data delivered?
API, files, or your warehouse. Daily, weekly, or hourly.
Name the commodity set, the geography and the status band when you request the sample - every gold-bearing prospect in one state, all Past Producers within a bounding box, the full A-graded subset worldwide. The sample ships first either way; the ongoing feed lands on whatever cadence your workflow needs, shaped to the scope you named rather than as an undifferentiated dump.
Who uses this data, and for what?
A national-scale site inventory earns its keep in five jobs:
- Exploration targeting and ground screening - Filter the 304,632 rows to a commodity, status band and bounding box - say gold occurrences in a Nevada county - and rank acreage before anyone files a claim.
- District dating and mining-history research - Discovery year, first and last production years and per-record references turn 'this district is old' into dated evidence of when ground was found, worked and abandoned.
- M&A and land-package comps - Past Producer and Producer rows around a target give deal teams the neighborhood comparables - what operated nearby, under what deposit model, until when.
- Supply-chain and critical-minerals mapping - Commodity tiers across every site map where antimony, tungsten or platinum-group exposure actually sits, country by country, without waiting on company disclosure.
- Prospectivity modeling and geospatial ML - Labeled positive points with grades, deposit models and host-rock codes assemble straight into training sets - the A-E letter doubles as a confidence weight.
Which personas get the most value?
Investors & Quant Researchers get deposit-level evidence behind a junior's claims, with status and production years to test the story. Data Scientists & ML Engineers get one flat table keyed on dep_id where features join without surprises. Developers & Builders get stable coordinates and names their map products can plot against, with the grade letter built in for demotion logic. Market Researchers & Consultants get citable federal site counts for client decks. Competitive Intelligence & Product Teams get land-package context grounded in the public record. Start from the best precious metals & minerals datasets shortlist, then pull a sample.
Notes and related datasets
Provenance note - compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey's Mineral Resources Program, merging the original MRDS with the Bureau of Mines' MAS/MILS archive; hundreds of reporters contributed over decades, which is why terminology varies record to record and the A-E grade exists in the first place.
Methodology note - screen with the grade before treating a site as firm ground: A records carry the fullest descriptions and reference lists, E records generally lack bibliographic backing. Commodity strings need parsing against the codes list, multi-value fields are delimiter-split rather than atomic, and absence differs from zero - a blank commodity tier means unreported, not none.
Completeness note - Datadory scores this record 9/10, and the twenty-one-field core above maps fully to the verified dictionary. The snapshot vintage stated in coverage is asserted by the publisher itself, caveats included, which is rarer than it should be and worth trusting.
Where to go next - keep the site ledger and add the layers around it: USGS Mineral Resources Online Spatial Data (MRDATA) wraps this register inside a catalog of assessments, geochemistry and geophysics; Mining Data Online: mining projects and companies database adds the corporate and cost side; MSHA Mine Data Retrieval System & Reports covers the operating present for US mines. The cards below collect the near neighbors.
Field dictionary
Every field below is documented against real records. The full dictionary ships with the sample.
| Field | Type | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
dep_id | string | Unique 12-digit system-generated deposit identifier referencing all records for a mineral property. | 10012410 |
site_name | string | Current preferred form of the name of the site, deposit or operation. | Henderson Mine |
latitude | number | Geographic latitude of the site in decimal degrees, WGS84 (observed range -76.6667 to 80). | 39.76916 |
longitude | number | Geographic longitude of the site in decimal degrees, WGS84 (observed range -178.8167 to 179.54917). | -105.84199 |
country | string | Name of the country in which the site is located; absent on some non-US records. | United States |
state | string | State or province of the site; absent on roughly 19% of rows overall. | Colorado |
com_type | enum | Type of commodities present: M metallic, N non-metallic, B both. | M |
commod1 | string | Primary commodities as a comma-separated list, hyphenated qualifiers following each; guidance was to include commodities viable as the only commodity. | Gold,Silver |
commod2 | string | Secondary commodities - economically recoverable but with little effect on project viability. | Lead,Zinc |
commod3 | string | Tertiary commodities - economically interesting but not recoverable as of the source-report date. | Tungsten |
oper_type | enum | Operation type existing or proposed: Surface, Underground, Surface-Underground, Placer, Offshore, Well, Processing Plant, Leach, Brine Operation, Geothermal or Unknown. | Underground |
dev_stat | enum | Development status: Occurrence, Prospect, Producer, Past Producer, Plant or Unknown. | Past Producer |
ore | string | Ore mineral or material found in the deposit. | Molybdenite |
gangue | string | Gangue mineral or material found in the deposit. | Quartz |
hrock_type | integer | Controlled code(s) for host rock type under the LithClass 6.2 lithology classification. | 2 |
model | string | Mineral deposit models characterizing the site; multiples delimited by braces with a model number each. | {Climax Mo} |
yr_fst_prd | integer | Year of first production; may carry a < or > modifier marking an open bound. | 1916 |
yr_lst_prd | integer | Year of last production; open bounds flagged the same way, so an active-looking span stays honest. | 1989 |
disc_yr | integer | Year the site was discovered, subject to the same bound modifiers. | 1904 |
ref | string | Bibliographic references supporting the record; braces delimit multiple references. | USBM MIN. RES. 1925 |
score | enum | USGS record-quality grade A-E reflecting amount and diversity of information; A richest, E generally lacking references. | A |
What teams do with it
- Exploration targeting and ground screening Filter the 304,632 rows to a commodity, status band and bounding box - say gold occurrences in a Nevada county - and rank acreage before anyone files a claim.
- District dating and mining-history research Discovery year, first and last production years and per-record references turn 'this district is old' into dated evidence of when ground was found, worked and abandoned.
- M&A and land-package comps Past Producer and Producer rows around a target give deal teams the neighborhood comparables - what operated nearby, under what deposit model, until when.
- Supply-chain and critical-minerals mapping Commodity tiers across every site map where antimony, tungsten or platinum-group exposure actually sits, country by country, without waiting on company disclosure.
- Prospectivity modeling and geospatial ML Labeled positive points with grades, deposit models and host-rock codes assemble straight into training sets - the A-E letter doubles as a confidence weight.
Questions buyers ask
What does the USGS Mineral Resources Data System (MRDS) deposit records dataset include?
304,632 mineral-site records worldwide - mines, prospects, occurrences and plants - each one row with a 12-digit identifier, WGS84 coordinates, tiered commodity lists, operation type, development status, ore and gangue minerals, deposit model, discovery and production years, references and an A-to-E information-richness grade, across 46 flattened fields.
Which metals have the deepest coverage?
Counting the primary commodity field alone, roughly 69,940 records list gold and 24,443 silver, with 1,002 platinum and 180 palladium. The table also spans the base metals, ferrous alloys and industrial minerals, since a site's value often rides on its secondary tiers - lead and zinc credits behind a precious-metal headline, for instance.
How reliable are individual records?
Every record carries a USGS-assigned grade from A to E reflecting the amount and diversity of information: A is richest, while E records generally lack bibliographic references. Screening workflows should require a minimum grade before treating a site as evidence, and weight occurrences below it accordingly - the letter exists precisely so that judgment is a filter.
How current are the deposit records?
Treat the table as a research snapshot: the extraction is dated 15 March 2016, the file was regenerated in August 2022, and systematic updates ceased in 2011. Operating status, ownership and production reflect only the date of each record's underlying source report, so verify any live-operating claim against current reporting before relying on it.
Does every record have coordinates?
No. Most rows pin a site to WGS84 decimal degrees, but some carry only administrative geography - the Big Bell example on this page shows Western Australia with no point. Roughly 19% of rows lack country or state values too, so coordinate-aware filters beat string matching, and missing geography means unreported rather than nonexistent.
How are multiple commodities represented?
In three tiers: primary commodities that could stand on their own economically, then secondary and tertiary lists, each a comma-separated string with hyphenated qualifiers noting the accounting basis. A row reading Gold,Silver in the primary tier is a gold operation with silver credit - the distinction commodity screens and supply-chain maps both depend on.
Who uses MRDS deposit records?
Exploration geologists screening ground and dating districts, deal teams building land-package comparables, supply-chain researchers mapping critical-minerals exposure, historians tracing mining booms, and machine-learning teams training prospectivity models on labeled deposit points weighted by the A-to-E grade.
See the rows before you pay anything.
Name this dataset and we send real records from it — scoped to the fields you asked for.